|
Planetfurry BBS Forums for Planetfurry Site Members and more
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Are TV ratings accurate? |
Yes |
|
4% |
[ 1 ] |
No |
|
27% |
[ 6 ] |
Don't know. |
|
40% |
[ 9 ] |
Never |
|
9% |
[ 2 ] |
Can be |
|
18% |
[ 4 ] |
|
Total Votes : 22 |
|
Author |
Message |
beno Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 352 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 2:51 pm Post subject: Are TV ratings accurate? |
|
|
We've all painfully watched shows we like (or love) pulled off of the TV because of bad ratings (Wonderfalls, and Father of the Pride to name a couple.) . But are they actually accurate? I personnally question the credibility in them, but have your say anyway. _________________ You turn 18 and you realize nothing changes... Except you get junk mail for credit cards. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joshua Fox Administrator
Joined: 02 Apr 2001 Posts: 898 Location: The Canadian Rainforest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Actually you might be surprised: I myself participated in several Nielson Ratings inquiries and found that the format they use is very helpful. Essentially you're given forms that ask you when you watch television, and when you do, what you watch. Ideally you're supposed to have the form next to you for a week whenever you watch TV; the only real trouble with that is the possibility of people lying or, of course, not turning the forms back in at all.
Looking at your Avatar, I assume you're particularly dissappointed in Father of the Pride being cancelled. Understandable; it was an excellent show. Though the reason that particular one was cancelled wasn't specifically 'low' ratings; it just meant the ratings weren't sufficient enough to make up for the cost to make each episode ($1.6 Million a shot, actually).
In that business, profit is the name of the game: if you're just breaking even, you really start to get worried. If you're losing cash, you pull the plug.
Sad, but true. _________________ Founder, Co-Founder, Newscaster and President-For-Life of Planetfurry News Network, a subsidiary of Planetfurry Corporation.
"This is PNN". |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PrincessB Registered User
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 3070 Location: south of Nashville, Tn
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 4:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well you already know my feelings on it, beno. But pretty much, no I don't find them accurate at all, they only ask a few people what they watch. The only way to really know would be to ask anyone (or any household) who owns a tv, and that they don't do. Most of the ratings are simply guessing.. <still sniffing over loss of Wonderfalls, I sooo want the dvd with all the episodes> _________________ http://www.bukisa.com/people/AmberBarnes check it out!
http://twitter.com/PrincessBTigres
Girls are like phones. We love to be held, talked too but if you press the wrong button you'll be disconnected! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vexxed Registered User
Joined: 06 Jan 2004 Posts: 399 Location: Boston, MA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Joshua Fox wrote: | Ideally you're supposed to have the form next to you for a week whenever you watch TV; the only real trouble with that is the possibility of people lying or, of course, not turning the forms back in at all. |
Well after taking a year of AP Statistics, I can tell ya that this is a pretty big problem in studies of any kind, and there's really no easy way around it. Since the Nielsen ratings are very big and very public, I think it's safe to assume that they use good statistical practices (i.e. randomization, avoiding bias, that sort of thing), but then again, who knows? I don't think that they're "simply guessing" though, because like it's been said, profit is the only important thing, and they may not want to risk guessing wrong and losing a bunch of money. Sort of an incentive to use good statistics, but the small percentages who like certain shows do indeed get screwed over.
Maybe they should make a channel that's entirely made up of shows cancelled by the major networks, supported mainly by viewers, and the programs that get on are decided by letters from viewers and such (so that the shows that actually are bad don't get put on there). I mean, I'm no television programming genius, but I do think it'd be an interesting thing to see. _________________ "This is fascinating. A whole tribe of people who prefer to interact as furry animals rather than human beings." -Gil Grissom
http://www.furaffinity.net/user/vexxed/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asalis Registered User
Joined: 08 Oct 2004 Posts: 2020 Location: Fort Worth, Tx
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I cant say that I know much about such things so i can only guess at best. However nothing is ever really perfect. And in situations like these profit most often wins out over all in buisness. More than likely they just didn't have the funds to keep running a show like this. CG isn't exactly cheap or easy to do. something like this takes a lot of time, effort, and money. Most CG shows like Father of the Prode for example are lucky to make it past a second season. _________________ Asalis: (uh*sah*lis)
We, dig, giant robots!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7PjQnw_E0U
I hate the DMV |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Sigurd Volsung Registered User
Joined: 21 Feb 2004 Posts: 3216 Location: The Twin Cities
|
Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2005 11:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think it would be more accurate to say that Neilson Ratings are affect by time slots, shows can be adversely effected by what other show are in that slot. An incredible show can be destroyed by being put in a time slot that competes with an established show. Even MASH almost didn't survive its first season because of this. So while the Neilson Ratings may accurately show viewer ship, it has nothing to do with how good a show is. _________________ Bad moods are like hangovers, they eventually go away. - A. Sigurd Olson |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Iron_Raptor Registered User
Joined: 15 Oct 2002 Posts: 50 Location: Toronto, Canada, eh?
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
I think Father of the Pride will go the way of Family Guy.
Fox will pull the plug, then notice the DVD sales are extraordinarily high and say 'Hey! Let's get back the show!' _________________ "The history of humanity is like an Endless Waltz, it constantly dances to the three beats of war, peace, and revolution." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tygon Site Owner
Joined: 03 Apr 2001 Posts: 2497 Location: Isernhagen, Lowersaxony, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 2:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm pretty sure that the TV ratings are accurate. Otherwise most commercial channels would have went buh-bye long ago.
The problem is that most furs in the fandom have a non-mainstream taste in what they like to watch. _________________ Tygon Panthera - name and species
www.planetfurry.com/~tygon/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JediFur Moderator
Joined: 03 Sep 2003 Posts: 314 Location: Lost in Space-Time
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Actually, there was a recent debacle in which the Neilsens admitted that they'd made serious errors multiple weeks in a row, which had affected advertiser decisions.
One has cause to wonder if vastly improving shows like Star Trek: Enterprise, and already strong shows were impacted in a way unfair to them, either giving them way too much credit, or not giving them enough.
There was talk that the Nielsons have been making quite a few more mistakes than were revealed, and some fans of the genre shows, like Trek, were demanding recounts and re-drawing of the ratings. If they were that far wrong, what's to say that Star Trek wasn't getting a 6 or 7 share, rather than the 3.6 or lower they were being assigned? 6 or 7 isn't great, but it's certainly not a show killer level.
-JediFur _________________ What are you doing to ensure the next generation will avoid becoming dangerously irrelevant?
Did you Know? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
hikaru Administrator
Joined: 20 Nov 2000 Posts: 1581 Location: Kansas City, KS, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 8:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
With the advent of digital cable, satelite TV and Tivo, it's become much easier for production groups to track the actual useage of the television audience. Tivo already does target marketing on the end customer based on what they watch. There's a rather famous article written about a guy who recorded some show with gay content and his Tivo started suggesting/auto-recording all kinds of gay content. In return, he tried to start recording macho-hetrosexual programs (including pornography) to try and untrain his Tivo.
I think the Neilson ratings are a thing of the past. They have their place as representing people outside the digital system, but that's the minority now.
It should be interesting to see what happens in the future.
Cheers _________________ Read my comic: http://www.ImperialGelf.com
Read my stories at http://www.IC-Stories.com
http://katayamma.deviantart.com/
"Coming to you Live and Transcribed..." - TVDave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
beno Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 352 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ves_Wolf wrote: | Joshua Fox wrote: | Ideally you're supposed to have the form next to you for a week whenever you watch TV; the only real trouble with that is the possibility of people lying or, of course, not turning the forms back in at all. |
Well after taking a year of AP Statistics, I can tell ya that this is a pretty big problem in studies of any kind, and there's really no easy way around it. Since the Nielsen ratings are very big and very public, I think it's safe to assume that they use good statistical practices (i.e. randomization, avoiding bias, that sort of thing), but then again, who knows? I don't think that they're "simply guessing" though, because like it's been said, profit is the only important thing, and they may not want to risk guessing wrong and losing a bunch of money. Sort of an incentive to use good statistics, but the small percentages who like certain shows do indeed get screwed over.
Maybe they should make a channel that's entirely made up of shows cancelled by the major networks, supported mainly by viewers, and the programs that get on are decided by letters from viewers and such (so that the shows that actually are bad don't get put on there). I mean, I'm no television programming genius, but I do think it'd be an interesting thing to see. |
You know, that's the best idea I've heard myself. But there'd have to be a few things done differently but overall, it's a good idea. Like to raise the money required to make the show people make small donations for the production of the show. I'm sure if everyone worldwide who likes these shows chipped in £/$1, there'd be enough to make a couple of seasons of material, even for expensive shows like Father of the Pride with as Joshua Fox correctly said, production costs of $1.6 million, that's roughly £1 million. But an finding organisation who wants to do this to simply break even, it's a bit of a long shot.
Oh, and I almost forgot to mention. With cult shows, members of the cult are often left out of the loop when Nielson ratings are collected. And with chaos theory, it's likely to throw the results one way or another. Let's face it, TV viewing is a chaotic system. _________________ You turn 18 and you realize nothing changes... Except you get junk mail for credit cards. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RunningCat Registered User
Joined: 31 May 2005 Posts: 171
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK it is time for me to chime in here. I work for a mid size TV station in the state of washington. Here is how the neilson rating system workin this area I get the other a little later. A Certain select number of people are asked to watch TV during the major rating periods and write it down in a Neilson Diary that diary at the end is then sent to neilson hedquarters where it tabulated. With those numbers we use it to determine which show to charge what amount in the future this includes all those show on during the day.
Now the day to day neilson ratings are done a little more sufiscated and is more accurate than the diary. There a set top rating system that tracks what is being seen on the TV at any one time this is usually where the day to day ratings come from. From those a safiscated rating system is formed (which I am not sure how it works but I could ask some at work) is figured on how many people are watching that show at that time.
I could find out more info on this subject info any one wants it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
beno Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 352 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I can see why they use the Neilson ratings system, but I can't see why they trust it so much. There's too much margin for error. We found this out at my school when we did an experiment with Nielson ratings. It just doesn't seem to work. And I said, but I'll say again, chaos theory dictates that there is a large margin of error. You just can't judge how many people watch a TV show from a small sample like the Neilson ratings. You have to have close to all the population for it to be accurate. _________________ You turn 18 and you realize nothing changes... Except you get junk mail for credit cards. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PrincessB Registered User
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 3070 Location: south of Nashville, Tn
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly why I say its mostly guessing. They question a small group of people then guess/suppose/assume that most of the population is like those few.. So if you give the questions to a group of 10 and 9 of them watch the football game on one chanel, and only one person watches Star Trek, this rating system will say that everyone likes sports and very few likes Star Trek, never mind that the 9 people were major sports nuts and were part of the very few that were actually watching the game, most were watching the season premeir of Star Trek. Its just guessing, taking a small amount of info in an area where u need tons of info and assuming that this tiny bit of info is all the possible info. _________________ http://www.bukisa.com/people/AmberBarnes check it out!
http://twitter.com/PrincessBTigres
Girls are like phones. We love to be held, talked too but if you press the wrong button you'll be disconnected! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
beno Registered User
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 352 Location: Liverpool, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2005 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, you're right. They don't take into consideration that their sample of 1000 or so viewers may miss out demographics. Like I'm sure many furries would have seen the ads for Father of the Pride and said to themselves, "I'm not missing that." But in a sample of 1000 you're gonna miss out demographics like that. _________________ You turn 18 and you realize nothing changes... Except you get junk mail for credit cards. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|