View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Daye Registered User
Joined: 23 Oct 2004 Posts: 6 Location: Just South of Houston, TX
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 9:17 pm Post subject: Feathers |
|
|
Any of you out there doing the 3D thing every try feathers?
Hair / fur is bad enough, I can't even begin to imagine how I would go about doing feathers and getting them to look right. LOL who am I kidding? Mr. Madonna chest here. . . .
1) Model them individually and end up with 75 bazillion polys and a six year render time
or
2) Use image maps / transparency maps ( would probably look flat )
Ideas? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mapper Registered User
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 892 Location: East coast somewhere
|
Posted: Wed Oct 27, 2004 9:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
texture map in combo with bump maps and transparency maps. not perfect but like ya said it would have a bazillion polys to make a true feather. _________________
Av by GreyCat
Last edited by Mapper on Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:34 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ryan Fox Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2004 3:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm I know Maya Unlimited's got that feature, you could use some 3rd party plugins, but these require a whack-load of CPU power and RAM
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little_Dragon Registered User
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 97 Location: Cave in the woods
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:00 pm Post subject: Re: Feathers |
|
|
Daye wrote: | 2) Use image maps / transparency maps ( would probably look flat ) |
Image maps and transparency are a good approach, and if you use a layered mesh (feathers beneath feathers) and stagger the arrangement you can give them some volume.
This example, rendered in Poser 5, consists of only 27 polygons. Not the best texture/transmap, admittedly, but what do you think? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daye Registered User
Joined: 23 Oct 2004 Posts: 6 Location: Just South of Houston, TX
|
Posted: Sat Oct 30, 2004 11:04 pm Post subject: Doable |
|
|
The methods I've seen used involve the layering of flat polygons with feather image / transparency maps on them. ( Exactly as you show ) They seem to work, but was thinking about the orientation nightmare of those polys.
On wing sections and main body it would be doable, but around the head and perhaps even the legs ( very small areas ) it would drive one to insanity I think
Though, aside from modeling the feathers individually ( not really practical ) I don't see another way of doing it myself.
-Daye |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ryan Fox Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 9:55 am Post subject: Re: Doable |
|
|
Daye wrote: | The methods I've seen used involve the layering of flat polygons with feather image / transparency maps on them. ( Exactly as you show ) They seem to work, but was thinking about the orientation nightmare of those polys.
On wing sections and main body it would be doable, but around the head and perhaps even the legs ( very small areas ) it would drive one to insanity I think
Though, aside from modeling the feathers individually ( not really practical ) I don't see another way of doing it myself.
-Daye |
Why not use Deep Paint3D and paint the textures onto the model?
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little_Dragon Registered User
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 97 Location: Cave in the woods
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 10:49 am Post subject: Re: Doable |
|
|
Daye wrote: | They seem to work, but was thinking about the orientation nightmare of those polys.
On wing sections and main body it would be doable, but around the head and perhaps even the legs ( very small areas ) it would drive one to insanity I think |
It helps if you're insane to start with ... saves a lot of time.
Example:
Every square inch of Wolfgang here (except for his head, hands, and toes) is covered in transmapped fur. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Little_Dragon Registered User
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 97 Location: Cave in the woods
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
* watches BriannaZombie lurch around the studio, moaning "Carrbbbssss" .... *
I dunno. Ever since they remade Night of the Living Dead ... it's just not the same any more. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mapper Registered User
Joined: 21 Jun 2003 Posts: 892 Location: East coast somewhere
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 10:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Holy @%$%# LD.
Dawn of the road kill.
Excellent Halloween Avatar. _________________
Av by GreyCat |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daye Registered User
Joined: 23 Oct 2004 Posts: 6 Location: Just South of Houston, TX
|
Posted: Sun Oct 31, 2004 10:46 pm Post subject: Re: Doable |
|
|
Ryan Fox wrote: | Daye wrote: | The methods I've seen used involve the layering of flat polygons with feather image / transparency maps on them. ( Exactly as you show ) They seem to work, but was thinking about the orientation nightmare of those polys.
On wing sections and main body it would be doable, but around the head and perhaps even the legs ( very small areas ) it would drive one to insanity I think
Though, aside from modeling the feathers individually ( not really practical ) I don't see another way of doing it myself.
-Daye |
Why not use Deep Paint3D and paint the textures onto the model?
|
The texture map method would work unless you were doing close up shots. Then it would become obvious the feathers were texture mapped pretty quickly.
I suppose I could, but me and DeepPaint don't get along well.
Well, sort of. It seems that everytime I get my licensekey re-initialized from the server, my system goes stupid and crashes. First time was a software failure ( Windows XP ) the second time was a hard drive crater. ( Have to release the key from the server before I can request it to authorize another load of it. Absolutely HATE that system. End up having to email them to get it working again. )
DeepUV does the same thing. Though DeepExploration doesn't. It doesn't require a server to connect with to work. Go figure. *sigh*
But, whatever. I'll have to think about it some more I suppose.
-Daye |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|